Letter Submission

To submit a letter to the editor, please email us at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. Letters must contain the author's name, hometown (state as well, if not in New Hampshire) and phone number, but the number will not be published. We do not run anonymous letters. Local issues get priority, as do local writers. We encourage writers to keep letters to no more than 400 words, but will accept longer letters to be run on a space-available basis. Letters may be edited for spelling, grammar, punctuation and legal concerns.


When confronted, Sec. Clinton clearly misled the American people

To The Daily Sun,

The announcement by FBI Director Comey simply defies explanation. He detailed Hillary Clinton's massive destruction of government records and grossly negligent handling of classified information. In recommending the Department of Justice decline prosecution of Secretary Clinton for recklessly mishandling and transmitting national security information, he sets a terrible precedent.

Further, the findings of this investigation make clear Secretary Clinton misled the American people when she was confronted with her criminal actions. There's a disconnect between Comey's findings and his recommendation not to prosecute Mrs. Clinton. Federal prosecutors, independent of politics, need to consider whether to pursue what appear to be violations of law confirmed by the FBI.

The Attorney General, director Comey's boss, met with Hillary's husband while the investigation was in progress. The meeting was held on the tarmac of the Phoenix airport. The most transparent administration in history laid the groundwork for a candidate who is the embodiment of political corruption.

Clinton's ability to thwart the press and keep information from the American public and her ability to blame her mistakes on everyone other than herself are reason to fear her. Clinton, like our current president, will allow her top officials to ignore the rule of law and to pummel the American public with impunity.

Laws cannot be for some while others are simply above the law. We either have law and it applies equally to all or we are without the rule of law. We cannot tolerate a situation where political affiliation determines whether you are the target of the law or you are above the law. It is time to end the way business is currently done in D.C.

Marc Abear


  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 188

The cost of operating the schools in Gilford is a runaway train

To The Daily Sun,

This coming Thursday, July 14, is the last day to pay your Gilford real estate taxes without incurring an interest charge. Did you ever wonder why Gilford taxes are so high in such a small town? A quick look at your tax bill with a calculator will shed some light: The portion of your Gilford real estate tax bill that is for the Gilford schools is 48.1 percent of the total tax bill, by far the largest portion of your total taxes. Why?

Much of the factual information is contained in the town's publicly-available 2015 Annual Report, but not necessarily presented in a format that would make it easy for you to understand the largest components of our school expenses and where there appear to be large wastes of your tax monies. So I have extracted and reformatted some of the data, which produces some interesting information. If any reader would like to receive by email copies of the schedules showing these items as reformatted by me, simply drop me an email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and I will happy to send you them by return email.

Please keep in mind what follows is based on the spending for 2015. Expenses in 2016 in the categories mentioned have almost certainly increased.

The 2015 enrollment in all three of the Gilford schools totaled only 1,207, including the several hundred students sent to our high school by Gilmanton. The total enrollment in the Gilford Schools has been declining fairly steadily for more than a decade.

Personnel costs in the Gilford public schools for administrative positions, rather than for teachers in the classrooms, seem to be out of whack.

Of total personnel costs of $17,327,366 in 2015 (including all benefits and tax contributions made on their behalf, on which they pay no income tax), $2,404,157 was for administrators. In the SAU alone, the superintendent and assistant superintendent cost $151,736 and $141,640, respectively, while six other SAU administrators cost in excess of $100,000 each.

The three school principals cost $118,911, $125,710, and $135,084, respectively, and the two assistant principals cost $122,918 and $115,182, respectively.

In the elementary school, the highest-paid teacher costs $131,055 and the lowest-paid teacher costs $47,352, while a total of seven teachers cost more than $100,000 each. In the middle school, the highest-paid teacher costs $119,444 and the lowest-paid teacher costs $56,650, while a total of six teachers cost more than $100,000 each. In the high school, the highest-paid teacher costs $119,160 and the lowest-paid teacher costs $40,644, while a total of nine teachers, three guidance personnel, and a media services director cost more than $100,000 each.

Ask yourself how these compensation packages compare to your own and to those of your neighbors.

After reviewing this data, some simple questions seem to arise naturally:

1. Why do we need our own School Administrative Unit serving only our town, and what do all of its employees do for our three schools that could not, or should not, rightfully be done by the highly paid principals and assistant principals in our schools? The total cost of the SAU essentially doubles the cost per student in our schools.

2. Do we really need to spend $193,279 in a single year for psychological services from four different professionals ($100,730 to one psychologist alone)? Were the services for the school students or the staff? To the extent that they were for students, whatever happened to the notion of parental responsibility? Do we really have that many students in need of psychological services whose parents are unable to pay and/or who do not have insurance coverage for them?

3. Why do our schools spend over $57,000 in a single year on what appears to be various organizations (often denominated on the vendor list by acronyms or abbreviations) most of which appear to have no apparent direct benefit to the students?

4. Why does the vendor list show numerous multiple entries for the same "vendor" listed in slightly different ways, which serves to conceal the actual totals paid to each "vendor?"

5. Is there anyone watching the expenditures with an eye toward reasonableness and proper stewardship of taxpayer money? If you think that the School Board is watching out for, and trying to eliminate wasteful spending, you are dreaming.

Are you going to believe the intense lines of smoke being blown at the taxpayers by those with vested interests in the huge school expenditures or, as they say, are you going to believe your lying eyes?

Here are some suggestions to consider as possible solutions to the problem of our runaway school costs in Gilford:

A. At the next school Deliberative Session, make sure to attend with your fellow Gilford residents and do not allow the meeting to be hijacked by those connected with the schools who always seem to try to increase the budget. Just vote "no!"

B. At the next town election in March 2017, vote only for candidates for the School Board who will promise to cut costs. That means most incumbents up for re-election should be thrown out of office by the voters.

C. If the proposed school budget is lower than the so-called default budget, you can bet that something is just not right and that those administrators who prepared, and those members of the School Board who approved, the default budget should be fired by the voters of Gilford.

D. Support changes to the laws to allow school vouchers in New Hampshire so that your pro-rata share of the schools' budget travel with the student and so parents can decide where to send their child without financial penalty. Where vouchers have been tried, they have worked.

Keep these facts in mind as you write your check for your taxes, and do not let the passage of time dull your memory of how badly you are being served by the Gilford schools' establishment.

Norman Silber

  • Category: Letters
  • Hits: 531